Beyond Preference: Evaluating the Welfare Effects of Islamic Banking
Published in University of Oregon, 2026
This paper develops a partial equilibrium model of consumer choice between Islamic and conventional banks to analyze how banking composition affects aggregate consumer welfare. The model incorporates borrower heterogeneity, risk-sensitive preferences, and stochastic investment returns, and is evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations. The results show that while a significant share of consumers prefer Islamic banking, its contribution to aggregate consumer surplus is modest. Counterfactual analysis indicates that replacing an Islamic bank with a conventional bank moderately reduces consumer surplus when loan rates are held constant. These findings suggest that Islamic banking enhances welfare primarily through preference matching rather than large efficiency gains. However, the analysis is limited to a partial equilibrium framework and does not account for macroeconomic feedback effects. Extending the model to a general equilibrium setting with endogenous bank behavior and dynamic borrower relationships remains an important direction for future research.
Recommended citation: Memon, S. (2026). Beyond Preference: Evaluating the Welfare Effects of Islamic Banking. University of Oregon.
Download Paper
